1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

by TEAMN0KTURNAL on Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:20 pm

before you watch the video choose your answer above..... not what I thought.... I can tell you that

crash test

by ED7_hatch on Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:33 pm

what a waste of a 59 worth more then the new one too lol

by Panda AE86 on Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:08 pm

I already know the answer. And it is what I think.

Tho I still cant believe those son of bitch's would fuck up a great fucking car like that.. WHAT A WASTE!!!!!

by egtoy on Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:57 pm

Naw that bel air was a replica not a real one! and it was made more weak an original bel air would demolish that Malibu. they only did that to show off to thier consumers that the Malibu would up hold a hard and raw crash like that.
trust me i know about bel air's i own one and no way would a 59 bel air end up like that.

by TEAMN0KTURNAL on Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:14 pm

the video was bias..... that wasnt a video from chevy..... and the bel air was real....

by iLuvsMeSumKoolAid on Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:11 pm

p0wnd!

1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

1959 chevy bel air vs. 2009 chevy malibu - if they both collided with each other head on, which driver is most likely to survive?...

1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

Re: 1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

Re: 1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

Re: 1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

Re: 1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)

Re: 1959 chevy bel air VS 2009 chevy malibu - head on collision (which driver would survive?)